17:00:18 #startmeeting Cloud WG weekly meeting 17:00:18 Meeting started Wed Nov 20 17:00:18 2013 UTC. The chair is samkottler. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:18 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 17:00:38 #chair mattdm rbergeron number80 17:00:38 Current chairs: mattdm number80 rbergeron samkottler 17:00:45 hello! 17:00:59 heyya 17:01:08 #topic rollcall 17:01:13 * samkottler is here :) 17:01:14 hey 17:01:23 * mrunge is very shortly here 17:01:26 #chair mrunge 17:01:26 Current chairs: mattdm mrunge number80 rbergeron samkottler 17:01:44 * mrunge suggests a different meeting time, as this is very inconvenient for me 17:02:18 mrunge: that's a good thing to talk about on the list 17:02:21 it's hard to do over IRC 17:02:32 I agree samkottler 17:02:47 esp. since there are other person not attending the meeting as well 17:02:58 thanks for coming nonetheless :) 17:03:18 indeed :) 17:03:31 let's just wait a couple more minutes for people to show up 17:03:47 well, I need to run away very shortly. so, I'll just drop off 17:04:36 * gholms goes to sit with the peanut gallery 17:06:00 okay I guess we'll get started, although we don't have quorum 17:06:09 * mattdm nods 17:06:23 #topic Google compute 17:06:35 I don't know exactly why but it's been a crazy chaotic week nad I feel like zero time has passed since last meeting. *sigh* 17:06:41 frankie isn't here so no update on packaging work right now 17:06:57 mattdm: yeah, same :( 17:07:12 looks like there was agreement on the mailing list that we should focus on cloud-init in the images 17:07:25 mattdm: yeah, seems like we don't even need to vote on that 17:07:32 gholms What do you think about carrying that debian patch? 17:07:56 I was gonna kick the tires on the tools google built, but totally ran out of time 17:08:05 I think it should go upstream for review. 17:08:17 Then I'm totally happy to grab it. 17:08:29 gholms: does canonical maintain the upstream? 17:08:51 Yes 17:08:52 I'll ping the google people about that. 17:09:06 #action mattdm to ping google about gce cloud-init patch upstream 17:09:30 I also reached out to legal about the trusted tester agreement 17:09:40 it's being reviewed right now, I should have word back today or tomorrow 17:09:53 * gholms hopes they aren't reluctant due to canonical's ridiculous contributor licensing racket 17:09:53 things seem promising, though 17:09:56 * samkottler knocks on wood 17:10:01 Nice! 17:10:05 gholms: you mean bzr? 17:10:06 :P 17:10:21 Nah, the full copyright license thing. 17:10:34 * gholms saves the rant for later 17:10:36 I know, twas kidding :) 17:10:44 ;) 17:11:08 so yeah, that's all I've got on the GCE front 17:11:20 anyone got anything else to add? 17:11:22 (they did indicate in a mailing list post that upstream was a goal) 17:11:27 What's the trusted tester thing? 17:11:29 that's aall from me for now too. 17:12:11 gholms: google makes people who want to upload images sign a document called the trusted tester agreement to basically give access to more advanced/not thoroughly tested parts of GCE 17:12:33 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/2013-November/002304.html 17:12:51 Mere mortals can't upload their own images? How sad. :( 17:13:32 gholms: I think ultimately they will be able to 17:13:40 the features just aren't fully rolled out 17:14:05 * gholms hopes that happens soon 17:14:17 gholms that's actually the state of the art in pretty much most public clouds except ec2 17:15:06 Yup. It's really disappointing. 17:16:00 Yup. Next thing, then? 17:16:35 #topic marketing/design document 17:17:25 so some background, the design + marketing teams have asked for some info about what our aims are 17:17:28 so they can plan accordingly 17:17:29 https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/3 17:17:56 it's a really good question :) 17:18:03 if we come across any issues that are contentious they'll have to wait until we have quorum, though 17:18:23 I don't think people know the difference between a server and a cloud guest yet, so we probably don't even know ourselves. ;) 17:18:24 mattdm: yeah, slightly interdependent on the PRD 17:18:43 definitely. 17:19:12 jzb just sent a really nice reply to the list 17:19:26 okay, so, proposal: more list discussion here. 17:19:57 (and by here, i mean "on this topic") 17:20:03 mattdm: WFM 17:20:08 (not "here on irc". that would make no sense) 17:20:29 There are more people on the list. :) 17:20:58 okay then 17:21:03 #topic open floor 17:21:24 I think we haven't really settled on how targetted we are going to be and how much we're going to do, say, jeos vs. some bigger solution (like coreos+docker) vs. "appliance library" 17:21:50 mattdm: sorry, do you want to keep the last topic going? 17:22:10 eh. that's basically all I have to say and I don't think we're going to decide it right now ;) 17:22:19 agreed 17:22:33 that's part of both the PRD and 'what even are we doing?!' 17:22:37 It doesn't even seem like people agree on whether the server should be the minimal thing or the guest should. More discussion is needed. 17:22:55 * mattdm nods 17:23:06 and then an actual decision. 17:23:10 we should probably loop in the server WG 17:23:20 and then have a bigger convo about all this 17:23:36 yeah. I actually have a bunch of mail in my inbox to reply to that relates to all of this. and on the server wg mailing list. 17:23:55 * samkottler needs to subscribe to that list 17:24:05 * gholms is still mad at openstack for overloading the term "server" even more 17:24:15 It's also possible that we end up doing that has a lot of overlap but in different ways. That's not as nice as everything fitting into a jigsaw puzzle but would still be okay. 17:24:37 * gholms nods 17:24:51 gholms: and triple-O even further blurs the lines 17:25:00 Heh, yep 17:25:12 treat your servers like cloud guests and then run your cloud guests on your cloud guests 17:25:15 AHHH 17:25:28 * jzb apologizes for being late. Damn time zones. 17:25:33 #chair jzb 17:25:33 Current chairs: jzb mattdm mrunge number80 rbergeron samkottler 17:25:58 Heya, jzb 17:26:07 gholms: howdy 17:26:10 jzb not too much at this meeting. got anything to raise? 17:26:19 samkottler: Eucalyptus does that, and let me tell you, it's awesome. 17:26:26 mattdm: have we discussed the branding stuff? 17:26:39 jzb mostly we said "more mailing list discussion" 17:26:41 I sent out a rough pass at the Q's mizmo asked 17:26:45 OK 17:26:51 i saw but havne't read yet 17:27:07 I'm writing up notes from re:Invent that I will share to the list later this week 17:27:22 she asked for that back by dec 3 so I think we should try to have something to by official for next week 17:27:30 "to be" 17:27:33 #info jzb sent out a rough pass at mizmo's questions 17:27:56 that's all I've got unless someone's got a task for me 17:28:09 #action jzb will send re:invent notes to the list this week 17:28:51 * samkottler doesn't have any other topics 17:29:26 yep i think we're done for now. 17:29:40 f20 test candidate images are coming out.... 17:29:55 testing them is a helpful thing to do. :) 17:29:59 mattdm: here I was worried I wouldn't have anything to do over Thanksgiving. 17:30:10 jzb right :) 17:30:20 #help Please help test f20 images 17:30:39 #endmeeting