=============================================== #fedora-bugzappers: F-15-Beta Blocker Review #3 =============================================== Meeting started by rbergeron at 16:59:57 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-03-25/f-15-beta-blocker.2011-03-25-16.59.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * Roll call! (rbergeron, 17:00:17) * Intro (rbergeron, 17:02:56) * review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and n-t-h bugs (rbergeron, 17:03:36) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (rbergeron, 17:03:56) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Beta_Release_Criteria (rbergeron, 17:04:05) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Current_Release_Blockers (rbergeron, 17:04:29) * the [[Current_Release_Blockers]] wiki page has approved, proposed, approved n-t-h, and proposed n-t-h bugs all listed. (rbergeron, 17:04:59) * ACTION: tflink to update bz's with info, THANK YOU SIR (rbergeron, 17:07:56) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676821 (rbergeron, 17:08:09) * 676821 was covered last week, is still in modified, was already accepted as a final release blocker. (rbergeron, 17:09:59) * AGREED: 676821 is still accepted as final release blocker, per last week's meeting (rbergeron, 17:12:01) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676968 (rbergeron, 17:12:30) * Already accepted last week - we're going to skip the already in MODIFIED anaconda bugs (rbergeron, 17:13:28) * hey would usually have got closed already, just because we couldn't do a compose yet we haven't been able to formally close them off (rbergeron, 17:13:48) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/678414 (rbergeron, 17:14:44) * AGREED: 678414 is still a blocker, waiting on feedback from jlaska (rbergeron, 17:18:55) * ACTION: jlaska to provide requested info on 678414 (rbergeron, 17:19:07) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/683179 (rbergeron, 17:19:44) * 683179 fix is in (rbergeron, 17:21:07) * AGREED: 683179 still a blocker, just waiting on testing, has been pushed to stable (rbergeron, 17:23:15) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/688306 (rbergeron, 17:23:42) * 688306 has already been accepted, no movement in the bug though. (rbergeron, 17:28:22) * this bug is actually addressed by gnome-settings-daemon-2.91.91-3 but the report has not yet been updated (adamw, 17:29:43) * AGREED: 688306 remains a blocker, fix is in and bug should be closed soon (adamw, 17:29:53) * ACTION: adamw to check on status of the update that fixes 688306 and update bug status appropriately (adamw, 17:30:05) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/681062 (rbergeron, 17:30:22) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681062 (rbergeron, 17:31:55) * ACTION: adamw to check on 681062 (rbergeron, 17:32:24) * AGREED: 681062 still a blocker (rbergeron, 17:32:36) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682141 (rbergeron, 17:32:57) * new upstream version of gnome-shell landed two days ago, may have this fix (rbergeron, 17:34:16) * ACTION: adamw to take a look at git trees and figure it out (rbergeron, 17:34:33) * gnome's bz is down (rbergeron, 17:34:37) * AGREED: 682141 is still a blocker, need to ask people to re-test with updated gnome-shell (rbergeron, 17:37:15) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677734 (rbergeron, 17:37:30) * ACTION: adamw to update 677734 because it's supposed to be a final blocker per the notes (rbergeron, 17:39:03) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679179 (rbergeron, 17:39:22) * AGREED: 679179 still a blocker, though recommendation is to remove files; if it is going to interfere with test compose we should note that and request a fix quickly (rbergeron, 17:44:16) * adamw talking to dgilmore currently to determine if qemu is on dvd and would affect TC (rbergeron, 17:44:40) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646843 (rbergeron, 17:44:59) * 646843 fixed in preupgrade-1.1.9-1, doesn't seem to have been submitted as an update (rbergeron, 17:47:33) * AGREED: 646843 still a blocker, action on maintainer to submit fixed version as an update (adamw, 17:49:06) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679486 (rbergeron, 17:49:20) * AGREED: 679486 still a blocker, needs testing (rbergeron, 17:51:53) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689291 (rbergeron, 17:52:23) * AGREED: 689291 neds to ask if it happens in a non-ipv6 config, and with new NM (rbergeron, 17:59:26) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679783 (rbergeron, 17:59:49) * AGREED: 679783 seems to be un-reproducible by skvidal, geppetto and adamw, looks like a transient cache issue, agreed not blocker or nth for now; reporter can re-propose if new info transpires (adamw, 18:12:03) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689779 (rbergeron, 18:12:22) * AGREED: 689779 can be closed, no longer a problem (rbergeron, 18:14:26) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689268 (rbergeron, 18:14:43) * there is already an update that can be pulled in for 689268 (rbergeron, 18:15:19) * AGREED: 689268 Accepted Blocker, update looks good, waiting for it to hit stable (rbergeron, 18:23:41) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689260 (rbergeron, 18:24:09) * AGREED: 689260 Accepted Final Blocker, Beta NTH, per final release criterion #11, apps in apps menu need to withstand a basic funcationality test and not crash after a few minutes of normal use (rbergeron, 18:28:55) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678927 (rbergeron, 18:29:41) * AGREED: 678927 keep monitoring for more information (rbergeron, 18:33:15) * lennart has been out on PTO this week (rbergeron, 18:33:26) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683835 (rbergeron, 18:33:50) * AGREED: 683835 is a dupe of 678927 (rbergeron, 18:35:16) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689090 (rbergeron, 18:35:46) * AGREED: 689090 -1 blocker, -1 nth unless testing shows that it DOES affect the installer rescue mode (rbergeron, 18:45:50) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688587 (rbergeron, 18:48:01) * AGREED: 688587 -1 NTH, subtitles not working doesn't fit NTH (rbergeron, 18:50:40) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673824 (rbergeron, 18:50:57) * was previously rejected as NTH, but has new use cases added, and has an update that needs testing and karma. (rbergeron, 18:51:49) * AGREED: 673824 Accepted NTH, update needs testing and karma (rbergeron, 18:53:13) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629311 (rbergeron, 18:53:52) * not actually going to review the Accepted NTHs, becusae they'ave already been accepted, but are just nice to have and not ZOMG if they don't get fixed (rbergeron, 18:55:39) * Any other business? (rbergeron, 18:56:04) Meeting ended at 18:57:00 UTC. Action Items ------------ * tflink to update bz's with info, THANK YOU SIR * jlaska to provide requested info on 678414 * adamw to check on status of the update that fixes 688306 and update bug status appropriately * adamw to check on 681062 * adamw to take a look at git trees and figure it out * adamw to update 677734 because it's supposed to be a final blocker per the notes Action Items, by person ----------------------- * adamw * adamw to check on status of the update that fixes 688306 and update bug status appropriately * adamw to check on 681062 * adamw to take a look at git trees and figure it out * adamw to update 677734 because it's supposed to be a final blocker per the notes * tflink * tflink to update bz's with info, THANK YOU SIR * **UNASSIGNED** * jlaska to provide requested info on 678414 People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * rbergeron (251) * adamw (155) * tflink (79) * Viking-rawhide (29) * brunowolff (23) * 15SAAC8I0 (22) * jsmith (11) * skvidal (9) * zodbot (8) * nirik (2) * rjune (2) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot