#fedora-bugzappers: Fedora 13 Alpha blocker bug review meeting #1

Meeting summary

1. 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&field0-0-0=blocked&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=MODIFIED&bug_status=ON_DEV&bug_status=ON_QA&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=RELEASE_PENDING&bug_status=POST&type0-0-0=substring&value0-0-0=%20538273&product=Fedora&classification=Fedora (adamw, 16:06:33)
   
   
2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557386 (adamw, 16:07:25)
   
3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557386 (adamw, 16:09:25)
   1. 557386 is agreed to remain a blocker (and release criterion will be added for abrt being broken), bug status is waiting for abrt team to confirm the fix provided by kernel team (adamw, 16:20:20)
   2. late-breaking news: jmoskovc confirms the 557386 change is what abrt team needs to make abrt work again (adamw, 16:22:40)
   
   
4. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559290 (adamw, 16:22:46)
   1. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Blocker_Bug_FAQ#What_about_hardware_and_local_configuration_dependent_issues.3F (jlaska, 16:34:42)
   2. AGREED: 559290 drops to Beta blocker, assign to LVM team for action (adamw, 16:36:52)
   3. ACTION: jlaska to update 559290 and assign to LVM team (adamw, 16:37:03)
   4. pjones thinks this is a case of incorrect allocation, not actual genuine usage of large amounts of RAM (adamw, 16:37:19)
   
   
5. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560334 (adamw, 16:38:19)
   1. AGREED: 560334 looks to be resolved: reporter cannot reproduce and neither can dlehman (adamw, 16:41:25)
   
   
6. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562209 (adamw, 16:43:00)
   1. AGREED: 562209 is a blocker, breaks 'installer must run from boot.iso' criterion. action is on anaconda team (adamw, 16:47:04)
   
   
7. (adamw, 16:48:05)
   
8. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557928 (adamw, 16:48:13)
   1. AGREED: 557928 is not an alpha blocker, we will punt to beta for now. anaconda team is looking at it (adamw, 16:55:57)
   
   
9. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560477 (adamw, 16:56:33)
   1. AGREED: 560477 is a blocker (breaks 'rescue mode most start successfully'), patch is written but not committed (adamw, 17:03:52)
   2. ACTION: pjones to push patch to fix 560477 (adamw, 17:04:03)
   
   
10. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557323 (adamw, 17:04:35)
    1. http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=anaconda.git;a=commit;h=8a87de5f8573e4d800c02b99c09762e44f5666cd (jlaska, 17:10:25)
    2. AGREED: 557323 is probably fixed, according to anaconda team: will be closed (adamw, 17:12:50)
    
    
11. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559679 (adamw, 17:13:40)
    1. AGREED: 559679 is fixed, the fixed selinux-policy hit rawhide already; closing (adamw, 17:15:47)
    
    
12. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560017 (adamw, 17:16:14)
    1. AGREED: 560017 is a blocker as per comment #3, it should be fixed, qa will confirm (adamw, 17:20:06)
    2. ACTION: jlaska to confirm fix for 560017 (adamw, 17:20:11)
    
    
13. checking beta and final blocker bugs for any that should be promoted (adamw, 17:21:32)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558678 - I filed this and set it to beta blocker (adamw, 17:21:45)
    2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523646 seems icky (adamw, 17:28:24)
    
    
14. open floor (adamw, 17:40:58)

Action items

1. jlaska to update 559290 and assign to LVM team
2. pjones to push patch to fix 560477
3. jlaska to confirm fix for 560017

Action items, by person

1. jlaska
   1. jlaska to update 559290 and assign to LVM team
   2. jlaska to confirm fix for 560017
2. pjones
   1. pjones to push patch to fix 560477

People present (lines said)

1. adamw (166)
2. jlaska (128)
3. pjones (22)
4. dlehman (18)
5. Oxf13 (6)
6. drago01 (4)
7. zodbot (3)
8. Tech33 (1)
9. stickster (1)
10. warren (1)