#fedora-board-meeting: Fedora Board Meeting

Meeting summary

1. Introduction (jsmith, 18:03:35)
   
2. <jjmcd> In view of our recent slip, is the board as passionate as poelcat about learning how to keep a schedule? (jsmith, 18:11:30)
   
3. <mizmo> i was wondering if we can work on a vision statement for fedora ... (rdieter, 18:17:04)
   
4. <EvilBob> What is the board's opinion on using something like systemd that as I understand it is still being coded this close to a release? Shouldn't core code be a bit more mature before inclusion? ... (rdieter, 18:29:10)
   
5. <rbergeron> We are asking a lot of questions in this public meeting ... possible for us to keep track of these questions and make sure they are answered somewhere ? (rdieter, 18:42:26)
   
6. <inode0> I see several negative effects of Red Hat retaining structural control over the composition of the Fedora Board. What benefit does the Fedora Project get from this arrangement? (rdieter, 18:54:55)
   
7. Updates (jsmith, 19:11:20)
   
8. Other Board Business (jsmith, 19:13:07)
   1. ACTION: jsmith to get a better description of the advisory-board list, and blog about it (jsmith, 19:27:38)
   2. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board#Contact <= doesn't say it's a place to ask questions, it says its a place for the board to discuss (mizmo, 19:28:16)

Action items

1. jsmith to get a better description of the advisory-board list, and blog about it

Action items, by person

1. jsmith
   1. jsmith to get a better description of the advisory-board list, and blog about it

People present (lines said)

1. jsmith (152)
2. mizmo (64)
3. rdieter (56)
4. stickster (29)
5. jds2001 (28)
6. smooge (25)
7. inode0 (23)
8. EvilBob (14)
9. rbergeron (12)
10. spot (9)
11. brunowolff (7)
12. caillon (5)
13. zodbot (4)
14. walters (4)
15. mmcgrath (3)
16. nirik (3)
17. ke4qqq (3)
18. ctyler (3)
19. jjmcd (2)
20. DiscordianUK (2)
21. val-l (1)