f20alpha-blocker-review-2
MINUTES

#fedora-blocker-review: f20alpha-blocker-review-2

Meeting started by tflink at 16:01:42 UTC (full logs).

Meeting summary

  1. Roll Call (tflink, 16:01:42)
  2. Introduction (tflink, 16:05:28)
    1. Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and freeze exception bugs. (tflink, 16:05:50)
    2. We'll be following the process outlined at: (tflink, 16:05:58)
    3. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (tflink, 16:05:58)
    4. The bugs up for review today are available at: (tflink, 16:06:05)
    5. http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (tflink, 16:06:05)
    6. The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (tflink, 16:06:11)
    7. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Alpha_Release_Criteria (tflink, 16:06:11)
    8. Up for review today, we have: (tflink, 16:06:16)
    9. 7 Proposed Blockers (tflink, 16:06:23)
    10. 4 Accepted Blockers (tflink, 16:06:23)
    11. 0 Proposed Freeze Exceptions (tflink, 16:06:23)
    12. 2 Accepted Freeze Exceptions (tflink, 16:06:23)

  3. (1000889) AttributeError: 'DeviceFormat' object has no attribute 'mount' (tflink, 16:07:15)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000889 (tflink, 16:07:18)
    2. Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 16:07:21)
    3. AGREED: 1000889 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 alpha release criterion: "The installer must be able to complete an installation to a single disk using automatic partitioning." (tflink, 16:09:27)

  4. (1000927) 20 Alpha TC1 i386 install image (netinst or DVD) freezes in the first step (tflink, 16:09:35)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000927 (tflink, 16:09:38)
    2. Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 16:09:40)
    3. AGREED: 1000927 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 alpha release criterion for 32bit installs: "When using the dedicated installer images, the installer must be able to complete an installation using the text, graphical and VNC installation interfaces." (tflink, 16:11:41)

  5. (994180) Boot-time LUKS passphrase input *always* defaults to en-us (tflink, 16:11:49)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994180 (tflink, 16:11:52)
    2. Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 16:11:54)
    3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875567#c20 (kparal, 16:20:13)
    4. ACTION: kparal to make sure 994180 is investigated (kparal, 16:29:23)
    5. AGREED: 994180 - This doesn't seem like an alpha blocker with the existing workarounds but we want to make sure those workarounds actually _work_ before rejecting. Will revisit at the next blocker review meeting (tflink, 16:31:25)

  6. (1000715) TypeError: Argument 2 does not allow None as a value (tflink, 16:31:41)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000715 (tflink, 16:31:44)
    2. Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 16:31:47)
    3. AGREED: 1000715 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 alpha release criteria for installs using a non-en-us keyboard: "The installer must run when launched normally from the release-blocking images." (tflink, 17:08:20)
    4. there was some discussion around whether we should have locale criterion or not but more investigation would be needed before any propoal went forward (tflink, 17:11:03)

  7. (1002055) [abrt] gnome-shell-3.9.90-1.fc20: g_variant_valist_new_nnp: Process /usr/bin/gnome-shell was killed by signal 5 (SIGTRAP) (tflink, 17:11:15)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002055 (tflink, 17:11:18)
    2. Proposed Blocker, gnome-shell, NEW (tflink, 17:11:20)
    3. AGREED: 1002055 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 alpha release criterion for the 32bit desktop spin: "Release-blocking live images must boot to the expected boot menu, and then to a desktop or to a login prompt where it is clear how to log in to a desktop." (tflink, 17:13:57)

  8. (1001081) anaconda unable to select INSTALLATION SOURCE (Exception yum.Errors.RepoError...) (tflink, 17:14:02)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001081 (tflink, 17:14:05)
    2. Proposed Blocker, pykickstart, MODIFIED (tflink, 17:14:08)
    3. AGREED: 1001081 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 alpha release criterion: "When using the DVD image, the installer must be able to use the DVD as a package source." (tflink, 17:15:20)

  9. (679486) Liveinst doesn't start if hostname changes (tflink, 17:15:30)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679486 (tflink, 17:15:30)
    2. Proposed Blocker, xorg-x11-xauth, ASSIGNED (tflink, 17:15:30)
    3. AGREED: 679486 - RejectedBlocker AcceptedFreezeException - This is a reoccurance of a bug that was accepted as final blocker for F19 but the fix didn't make it into F20. It doesn't violate any F20 alpha release criteria but a tested fix would be considered after freeze. (tflink, 17:20:45)

  10. (995268) TypeError: Argument 2 does not allow None as a value - If no hostname is set by DHCP (tflink, 17:23:47)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995268 (tflink, 17:23:50)
    2. Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED (tflink, 17:23:52)
    3. AGREED: 995268 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F20 alpha release criteria for non-en-us locales or improperly detected locales: "Release-blocking dedicated installer images must boot to the expected boot menu, and then after a reasonable timeout to the installer." (tflink, 17:35:04)

  11. (997690) SizeNotPositiveError: bytes= param must be >=0 (tflink, 17:36:57)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997690 (tflink, 17:36:58)
    2. Accepted Blocker, anaconda, POST (tflink, 17:36:58)
    3. patch submitted, waiting for merge and new anaconda build (tflink, 17:39:03)

  12. (983319) Install gets stuck returning from Installation Destination spoke (tflink, 17:41:41)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=983319 (tflink, 17:41:44)
    2. Accepted Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED (tflink, 17:41:46)
    3. this has been fixed in anaconda-20.8-1 (F20 Alpha TC1) and can be closed (tflink, 17:43:28)

  13. (985342) illegal instructions with glibc-2.17.90 on armv7hl (tflink, 17:45:20)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985342 (tflink, 17:45:23)
    2. Accepted Blocker, glibc, MODIFIED (tflink, 17:45:26)
    3. there is a new build that should fix this issue on the affected armv7hl platforms (tflink, 17:48:19)
    4. glibc-2.18-5.fc20 will be in TC2 or TC3, will need testing to verify (tflink, 17:49:37)

  14. Open Floor (tflink, 17:50:38)
    1. Alpha Change Deadline is 2013-09-03 (tflink, 17:52:24)
    2. the next blocker review meeting will be 2013-09-04 @ 16:00 UTC in #fedora-blocker-review (tflink, 17:53:58)


Meeting ended at 17:56:13 UTC (full logs).

Action items

  1. kparal to make sure 994180 is investigated


Action items, by person

  1. kparal
    1. kparal to make sure 994180 is investigated


People present (lines said)

  1. tflink (234)
  2. spstarr_work (126)
  3. kparal (99)
  4. handsome_pirate (64)
  5. Viking-Ice (41)
  6. pschindl (26)
  7. pwhalen (13)
  8. mkrizek (10)
  9. ignatenkobrain (9)
  10. zodbot (9)
  11. jreznik (8)
  12. seasc (7)
  13. dgilmore (6)
  14. dcantrell (4)
  15. roshi (2)
  16. nirik (1)


Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.
Meetbot Logs © 2021-2022 Fedora Websites and Apps Team (Sources)