=================================================== #fedora-blocker-review: f19final-blocker-review-1.1 =================================================== Meeting started by tflink at 16:02:30 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-05-30/f19final-blocker-review-1.1.2013-05-30-16.02.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (tflink, 16:02:30) * Introduction (tflink, 16:21:13) * Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and freeze exception bugs. (tflink, 16:21:20) * We'll be following the process outlined at: (tflink, 16:21:28) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (tflink, 16:21:28) * The bugs up for review today are available at: (tflink, 16:21:34) * LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (tflink, 16:21:34) * The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (tflink, 16:21:41) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Final_Release_Criteria (tflink, 16:21:41) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Beta_Release_Criteria (tflink, 16:21:44) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Alpha_Release_Criteria (tflink, 16:21:47) * Up for review today, we have: (tflink, 16:21:50) * 11 Proposed Blockers (tflink, 16:21:57) * 4 Accepted Blockers (tflink, 16:21:57) * 11 Proposed Freeze Exceptions (tflink, 16:21:57) * 7 Accepted Freeze Exceptions (tflink, 16:21:57) * (965865) ValueError: ('invalid size specification', '-880.000000 MB') (tflink, 16:23:07) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965865 (tflink, 16:23:10) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 16:23:13) * AGREED: 965865 - The cause of this is still very unclear, will revisit at a later meeting (tflink, 16:30:09) * (967527) /root/anaconda-ks.cfg crashes anaconda (tflink, 16:30:44) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967527 (tflink, 16:30:44) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 16:30:44) * LINK: http://www.happyassassin.net/ks/967527.ks (adamw, 16:49:03) * AGREED: 967527 - some people can reproduce the behavior, others are not able to. will split this bug into two for the different issues and will revisit after dev input (tflink, 16:56:36) * (968915) Anaconda locks user account instead of creating it password-less (tflink, 16:56:50) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968915 (tflink, 16:56:53) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 16:56:56) * AGREED: 968915 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F19 alpha release criterion for installs with a passwordless user created during install: "After firstboot is completed and on subsequent boots, a graphical install must boot to a log in screen where it is possible to log in to a working desktop as the user created during firstboot." (tflink, 17:01:06) * (968951) User data from first boot are copied to new users (tflink, 17:01:21) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968951 (tflink, 17:01:21) * Proposed Blocker, gnome-initial-setup, NEW (tflink, 17:01:21) * AGREED: 968951 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F19 final release criterion when creating a second user right after running gnome-initial-setup for an admin user: "The release must contain no known security bugs of 'important' or higher impact according to the Red Hat severity classification scale which cannot be satisfactorily resolved by a package update (e.g. issues during installation)" (tflink, 17:11:59) * (919855) [abrt] gnome-settings-daemon-3.7.91-1.fc19: getenv: Process /usr/libexec/gnome-settings-daemon was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV) (tflink, 17:12:17) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919855 (tflink, 17:12:20) * Proposed Blocker, gnome-settings-daemon, NEW (tflink, 17:12:22) * AGREED: 919855 - While this seems like it has blocker potential, it isn't a clear criteria violation and it would be better to have more than 3 people voting to take it as a blocker. Will revisit at the next review meeting (tflink, 17:25:52) * (968936) SIGSEGV of packagekit-offline-update.service during update (tflink, 17:26:07) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968936 (tflink, 17:26:10) * Proposed Blocker, PackageKit, NEW (tflink, 17:26:12) * AGREED: 968936 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F19 alpha release criteria for gnome's offline updates: "The installed system must be able to download and install updates with yum and with the default graphical package manager in all release-blocking desktops" (tflink, 17:41:46) * (968794) KDE keyboard input impossible with ibus enabled and qt updated to 4.8.4-18 (tflink, 17:41:55) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968794 (tflink, 17:41:58) * Proposed Blocker, qt, NEW (tflink, 17:42:01) * AGREED: 968794 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F19 final criterion for users who rely on ibus input on KDE: " All elements of the default panel (or equivalent) configuration in all release-blocking desktops must function correctly in common use" (tflink, 17:50:04) * (969032) IOError: [Errno 9] Bad file descriptor (tflink, 17:53:12) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969032 (tflink, 17:53:12) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 17:53:12) * AGREED: 969032 - There isn't much data to go off of here. Ask reporter to try with a different usb stick and will revisit at a later review meeting. (tflink, 18:10:42) * (965841) anaconda no longer creates /etc/sysconfig/network, systems without NetworkManager do not bring up network (tflink, 18:14:24) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965841 (tflink, 18:14:26) * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, anaconda, POST (tflink, 18:14:29) * AGREED: 965841 - AcceptedFreezeException - While not quite a blocker, this could be a big problem for systems which don't have NetworkManager installed. A tested fix would be considered past freeze. (tflink, 18:18:29) * (967660) anaconda erases additional biosboot partitions outside of what was setup for 'reformat' (destroys spare biosboot partitions one might have on other disks) (tflink, 18:18:37) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967660 (tflink, 18:18:41) * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 18:18:43) * AGREED: 967660 - AcceptedBlocker - Violates the following F19 final release criterion for systems with multiple gpt biosboot partitions: "All known bugs that can cause corruption of user data must be fixed or documented at Common F19 bugs" (tflink, 18:24:32) * (966784) anaconda storage spoke is left in 'warning checking storage configuration' with the 'begin install' button unlocked (logs shows that the spoke is ready) (tflink, 18:24:47) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966784 (tflink, 18:24:51) * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 18:24:53) * AGREED: 966784 - RejectedFreezeException - This may not be clear to users, but it is by design. If anaconda devs want to change the dialog, please re-propose. (tflink, 18:30:24) * (881403) Anaconda doesn't correctly infer if system clock shows UTC or local time (tflink, 18:30:34) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881403 (tflink, 18:30:37) * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, anaconda, POST (tflink, 18:30:39) * AGREED: 881403 - AcceptedFreezeException - This was a commonly reported issue in F18 and a fix has been in the works for a while now. A tested fix would be considered after freeze. (tflink, 18:37:30) * (963958) dialog-warning-symbolic.svg (used as the 'warning triangle' emblem in anaconda) is now grey; if anaconda wants the old orange one, anaconda should ship it (tflink, 18:37:38) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963958 (tflink, 18:37:42) * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, anaconda, VERIFIED (tflink, 18:37:44) * AGREED: 963958 - AcceptedFreezeException - This fixes a visual issue that confused many people in beta. A tested fix would be considered after freeze. (tflink, 18:39:57) * (967682) Check mark used to indicate selected target disks on Installation Destination is not sufficiently obvious (tflink, 18:40:06) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967682 (tflink, 18:40:09) * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 18:40:11) * AGREED: 967682 - AcceptedFreezeException - This would fix a decent amount of confusion regarding disk selection in the UI. A tested fix would be considered past freeze. (tflink, 18:48:11) * (968023) NFSv3 mount of installation repository fails unless 'nolock' option is passed (tflink, 18:48:15) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968023 (tflink, 18:48:18) * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, anaconda, POST (tflink, 18:48:21) * AGREED: 968023 - AcceptedFreezeException - This would eliminate a workaround required for nfs3 repos at install time. A tested fix would be considered after freeze. (tflink, 18:52:49) * Open Floor (tflink, 18:55:17) Meeting ended at 19:02:49 UTC. Action Items ------------ Action Items, by person ----------------------- * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * tflink (218) * adamw (189) * kparal (160) * ignatenkobrain (26) * zodbot (7) * satellit (7) * jreznik (2) * satellit_e (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot